1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. a) This does meet the rule of three because it follows the three rules, but it doesn't feel like a strong EQ.
b) This does meet the rule of three because it provides a framework, is specific, and takes a stance.
c) This does not meet the rule of three because it doesn't provide a framework and the format doesn't feel right, but you could take a stance because this question is based on opinion.
d) This does meet the rule of three because it provides a framework, takes a stance, and is specific. This sounds like a strong EQ.
3. How can a veterinarian best handle a pet during a visit so it won't be uncomfortable?
No comments:
Post a Comment